Those who believe "climate change" has made the Earth a tinder box, ready to burst into flames at a moment's notice, continue to lobby hard for legislation to give the Commonwealth the power to regulate local water use during times of drought.

That is, take control away from local communities and give it to the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs.

To be clear, these climate alarmists want to give an unelected official at the executive level of state government, and not elected officials at the local level, the authority to restrict water use on your street.

In other words, an appointed bureaucrat on Beacon Hill would tell you when you can water your lawn.

WBSM-AM/AM 1420 logo
Get our free mobile app

Water use for agriculture or businesses would be exempted, according to State House News Service (SHNS).

SHNE reported that "Similar legislation received a favorable report from the Committee on Environmental and Natural Resources last year and died in the Senate Ways and Means Committee."

Massachusetts Could Impose Restrictions On Local Water Use
Getty Images
loading...

Rep. Joan Meschino (D-Hull), the sponsor of the House version of the legislation, reportedly believes the conservation measures that take local decisions from individual community leaders and place them with the state are necessary for "resilience," "biodiversity" and "climate mitigation."

Meschino told the Commonwealth Beacon, "The current patchwork approach leaves towns to fend for themselves and leads to regional inequities."

The Massachusetts River Alliance strongly supports the legislation.

Various versions of the legislation have been sponsored and supported by Democrats and Republicans in recent years.

The Beacon reported, "The state's climate resiliency plan notes that warmer temperatures due to climate change will likely lead to longer, more severe droughts and a longer, more severe wildfire season."

LOOK: The most expensive weather and climate disasters in recent decades

Stacker ranked the most expensive climate disasters by the billions since 1980 by the total cost of all damages, adjusted for inflation, based on 2021 data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The list starts with Hurricane Sally, which caused $7.3 billion in damages in 2020, and ends with a devastating 2005 hurricane that caused $170 billion in damage and killed at least 1,833 people. Keep reading to discover the 50 of the most expensive climate disasters in recent decades in the U.S.

Gallery Credit: KATELYN LEBOFF

25 costliest hurricanes of all time

Although the full extent of damage caused by Hurricane Ian in the Southwest is still being realized, Ian is already being called one of the costliest storms to ever hit the U.S. Stacker took a look at NOAA data to extrapolate the costliest U.S. hurricanes of all time.  

More From WBSM-AM/AM 1420